Difference in societies of new england

Families in New England were much larger, and consisted of both males and females. In contrast, families of the Chesapeake were primarily men brought over to work the fields.

Difference in societies of new england

Their differences in religion, politics, economics, and social issues, and the way they dealt with them, are what shaped our country into what we are today.

The Puritans founded the northern colonies of New England. Not all New England colonists were Puritans, but the Puritan religion was a major influence in the seventeenth-century New England way of life Roark In the last half of the seventeenth century the Quakers began to populate Massachusetts.

Quakers believe that neither preachers nor Bibles are necessary to worship God, which is the polar opposite of the Puritan religion. Many New England communities treated Quakers poorly and many Quakers saw acts of violence inflicted on them in the name of God Roark Quakers began to populate the middle colonies aroundafter the English crown had seized the colony of New Netherland, renamed it New York, and encouraged the creation of a Quaker colony led by William Penn Roark In addition to the Quakers, many other religions began to settle in the middle colonies.

Religion in the southern colonies was not practiced with the enthusiasm that it was in New England. While most colonists of the south were Anglicans, their true faith lay in their tobacco plantations. The same was true for the Catholic founders of Maryland.

As their population grew, Protestants began to outnumber Catholics, though the Catholics continued to hold the power and influence.

Just as in the other southern colonies, religion eventually took a back seat to tobacco in Maryland Roark Politics in the colonies were as varied as their religious preferences. The Massachusetts Bay Company stockholders, known as freemen, were empowered by charter to meet as a body called the General Court.

The General Court made laws and governed the company. The colonists of New England took the General Court concept and used it to govern their colonies. The General Court ruled that freemen could only be male church members to make sure only godly men could decide government issues.

The number of freemen eventually grew too large so they agreed to send two deputies from each colony to the General Court to act as representatives for the colony Roark The middle colonies were ruled largely by the British monarchy until William Penn was granted land by the throne and formed Pennsylvania.

Voters had to be Christian, as well as anyone wishing to hold office, but the local government did not force settlers to attend church or to pay taxes to support the church, as in other colonies. Penn was free to rule his colony as he saw fit, and was answerable to only the king of England. Penn developed a colonial council made up of tax-paying landowners that had the power to develop laws and administrate the government.

He also appointed a governor who had the power to veto any laws passed by the council. The southern colonies, like Virginia, were ruled by the oldest legislative body in America, called the House of Burgesses Handlin The king of England appointed a royal governor, who in turn selected his council.

This body was the upper house. Representatives from each region in the colony were selected by their inhabitants to form the lower house; the House of Burgesses. Counties were established to provide government on the local level and were administered individually by a board of commissioners known as the county court.

These men were responsible for judicial and administrative matters in their area. A large majority of the southern colonies followed the Virginia model of government Kelley The rocky soil of New England did not permit the type of farming that was done in other regions.the New England and Chesapeake Bay Regions During the 's, people in the American colonies lived in very distinctive societies.

Expert Answers

While some colonists . The difference here is that Virginia had a very large population of people of African descent while New England did not.

This is not to say that slavery did not exist in New England. Although New England and the Chesapeake region were settled largely by people of English origin, by the regions developed into two distinct societies. Why did this difference in development occur and in what ways were these societies different?

Introduction and Thesis. Difference in Societies of New England and Chesapeake Region Essays Words | 3 Pages "Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely by people of English origin, by the regions had evolved into two different societies, why did this difference in development occur?".

Describe the differences and similarities between the societies and economies of the southern, middle, and New England colonies. “Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely by people of English origin, by the regions had evolved into two different societies, why did this difference in development occur?

” For different reasons, settlers chose to inhabit the regions of New England and Chesapeake.

Difference in societies of new england
AP SAT Central: Chesapeake v. New England Colonies