This information may pertain to the program as a complete entity or only to some of its components. Evaluation also implies the selection of criteria, collection and analysis of data.
Why Evaluate Public Health Programs? To ensure that effective programs are maintained and resources are not wasted on ineffective programs Program staff may be pushed to do evaluation by external mandates from funders, authorizers, or others, or they may be pulled to do evaluation by an internal need to determine how the program is performing and what can be improved.
While push or pull can motivate a program to conduct good evaluations, program evaluation efforts are more likely to be sustained when staff see the results as useful information that can help them do their jobs better. Data gathered during evaluation enable managers and staff to create the best possible programs, to learn from mistakes, to make modifications as needed, to monitor progress toward program goals, and to judge the success of the program in achieving its short-term, intermediate, and long-term Curriculum evaluation.
Most public health programs aim to change behavior in one or more target groups and to create an environment that reinforces sustained adoption of these changes, with the intention that changes in environments and behaviors will prevent and control diseases and injuries.
Through evaluation, you can track these changes and, with careful evaluation designs, assess the effectiveness and impact of a particular program, intervention, or strategy in producing these changes.
The Working Group prepared a set of conclusions and related recommendations to guide policymakers and practitioners. Encourage the adoption of participatory evaluation approaches that provide meaningful opportunities for involvement by all of those with a direct interest in initiatives programs, policies, and other organized activities.
Ensure that a mixture of process and outcome information is used to evaluate all health promotion initiatives. Support the use of multiple methods to evaluate health promotion initiatives.
Support further research into the development of appropriate approaches to evaluating health promotion initiatives. Support the establishment of a training and education infrastructure to develop expertise in the evaluation of health promotion initiatives. Create and support opportunities for sharing information on evaluation methods used in health promotion through conferences, workshops, networks, and other means.
The underlying logic of the Evaluation Framework is that good evaluation does not merely gather accurate evidence and draw valid conclusions, but produces results that are used to make a difference. You determine the market by focusing evaluations on questions that are most salient, relevant, and important.
You ensure the best evaluation focus by understanding where the questions fit into the full landscape of your program description, and especially by ensuring that you have identified and engaged stakeholders who care about these questions and want to take action on the results.
The steps in the CDC Framework are informed by a set of standards for evaluation. The 30 standards cluster into four groups: Who needs the evaluation results? Will the evaluation provide relevant information in a timely manner for them? Are the planned evaluation activities realistic given the time, resources, and expertise at hand?
Does the evaluation protect the rights of individuals and protect the welfare of those involved? Does it engage those most directly affected by the program and changes in the program, such as participants or the surrounding community?
Will the evaluation produce findings that are valid and reliable, given the needs of those who will use the results? Sometimes the standards broaden your exploration of choices.
Often, they help reduce the options at each step to a manageable number. Utility Who will use these results? Feasibility How much time and effort can be devoted to stakeholder engagement? Propriety To be ethical, which stakeholders need to be consulted, those served by the program or the community in which it operates?In relation to curriculum, evaluation is the process of making value judgements about the merit or worth of a part or the whole of a curriculum.
The nature of a curriculum evaluation often depends on its audience and purpose. The potential audiences include.
In relation to curriculum, evaluation is the process of making value judgements about the merit or worth of a part or the whole of a curriculum. The nature of a curriculum evaluation often depends on its audience and purpose.
Program evaluation is carefully collecting information about a program or some aspect of a program in order to make necessary decisions about the program.
Program evaluation can include any or a variety of at least 35 different types of evaluation, such as for needs assessments, accreditation, cost/benefit analysis, effectiveness, efficiency. Curriculum evaluation aims to examine the impact of implemented curriculum on student (learning) achievement so that the official curriculum can be revised if necessary and to review teaching and learning processes in the classroom.
The foci of curriculum evaluation also need to be expanded. To use the concepts of this present work, curriculum evaluation should be concerned with assessing the value of a. Curriculum evaluation is a method for determining the worth and effectiveness of any newly implemented curriculum.
There are several stakeholders with interest in the results of curriculum.